What is actually All people finding very good accuracy with for 180gr products and 4831? Just looking for a place to begin so I don't squander a bunch of parts. Many thanks for the assistance!
They've performed identically for me. Like everyone else I rushed to have the newer SC Model but have now switched back. Ideally you need about a hundred% loading density. When you have sufficient case ability with the H4831(lengthy) you will be probably much better off.
Liberalism; The difficult nevertheless recognized Idea that it's fully attainable to select up a turd via the clear stop.
Minnesota H4831SC is my go to during the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the little I've left for drop 2021. I might begin very low and perform your way up, depending on what load data you have a look at for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
IMR powders also preform effectively for me with a single notable exception. The many chrongraphing I've finished with them indicates the velecity is consistant over 32 levels but starts to vary when the temp begins to fall. The nearer to zero I get the more they fluctuate. I've witnessed just as much as 250 fps in a ten shot string with my 243 and 223 within the winter time all-around right here. Haven't seen this with a number of the other powders.
Considering that there isn't going to seem like any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can many of you provide a place to begin with this mixture and factors to think about when Functioning this Load up?
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a restricted provide of Varget, and also a large amount much more readily available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Practically solely, because that's what the rifles shoot the very best.
Im underneath the understanding I want to use h4831sc. I've h4831sc read that these powders are equivalent Other than the shorter grain dimensions with the sc. Ought to I however be looking out for h4381sc?
I've identified the precise opposite to become genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally precise powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are superior. It bug the hell from me. I know superior. That is why I do not ever toss out my h4831sc load data more mature manuals. I do purchase new guide all the time to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ 100+ levels without any complications.
If there isn't a load data it truly is for the reason that this powder h4831sc is not ideal for this cartridge. Normally just one is not going to come across just one powder to suit all cartridges, and the loved ones of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about would not function. Click to expand...
Of course, You should use the exact same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, though the SC Variation may permit you to get a little a lot more in conditions where you are maxing out situation quantity Along with the typical powder right before achieving strain limitations.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my three hundred WM but experienced far better speed and precision with H1000. I would instead utilize a slower burning powder with 215g supplements.
This looks as if a fantastic place to divulge a little bit more data on Hodgdon, H4831 specifically...I the moment experienced a pound of H4831SC sit about the shelf for a variety of yrs. It had been ordered right before Hodgdon started publicizing the "Excessive" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.